Showing posts with label Bloggers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bloggers. Show all posts

Monday, March 03, 2008

Iain Dale - The Blogging Equivalent of The Emperor's New Clothes

I've never had much time for Iain Dale. He always seemed to be such a smug Tory bastard. That and the fact that he seemed to have nominated himself as spokesperson for UK political bloggers (not to mention that he is the very embodiment of all I hate round my neck of the woods). Quite simply, the rise of Dale has meant that a fall was inevitable and at some point people would realise his grasp on politics is weak to say the least. Hence his contribution to Comment is Free:

Yes they can?

Barack Obama and David Cameron have a lot in common: they're both young men in a hurry, facing opponents who were the future once

Yes, this piece was an attempt by Dale to draw some kind of parallel between Cameron and Obama. Now, I would be the first to admit that there is little real difference between any of the four major parties split between the US and the UK, but this smacks of desperation somewhat (nothing to do with the Tories failing to capitalise on Labour's misfortunes??). Perhaps, with articles such as this, Dale might finally be found out.

Even more interestingly, after receiving a well deserved ridiculing from readers of CiF, Dale posted the following on his website:

Oh dear, I seem to have upset the esteemed readers of COMMENT IS FREE. Last week, my Telegraph column was supposed to have been about what David Cameron can learn from Barack Obama. Sadly, it got overtaken by events and I was asked to write about Andrew Lansley instead. Anyway, rather than let a provocative column go to waste, I thought what better use to make of it than to wind up the Obama supporting fanatics of The Guardian. Judging from the comments beneath the article, I succeeded beyond my wildest dreams. Read the full column HERE.


Yes, seems rather like the response you would expect from a teenager doesn't it?? "Oh, I was only doing to wind them up." Indeed. Truly, Dale's blog is the very definition of the Emperor's new clothes.......and we can all see his winkle.

Thursday, February 07, 2008

Free At Last!

Finally, after months of toil I have some breathing space. I have been neglecting this blog of late whilst I concentrate on some (pretty hard going) studying, but I have finally caught up and I am now free to dedicate more of my time to this wee blog. Thanks to RickB of Ten Percent, Hugh Manatee of typing is not activism... and a special mucho gracias a Gonzalo who have all posted many varied and interesting posts in my abscence. Now the catch up begins........

Monday, October 08, 2007

Letter to America

Below is the letter I have sent to Blog to America. Whether it is published there or not, who knows?

Dear America,
Your government, not to mention your political system, has failed you. George W Bush has failed you. There are many reasons why I feel that your government has failed you, I hope I can clarify why during the course of this letter.

Your government has failed you at the most basic level. The overriding job of any government is to protect its citizens. That is a fundamental foundation of any civilised nation. Sadly, your government has chosen not to protect its citizens. Instead, it has decided to cut you loose and see if you sink or swim. Inevitably, it is the poor who sink. Take for example the recent legislation rejected by President Bush. Bush had a chance to ensure that every section of society was given the ability to swim. When presented with a bill to extend health insurance to millions of children, he could have chosen to embrace American society and ensure every member of the society was given an equal chance in life, regardless of their financial background. However, he chose (for the fourth time in seven years) to reject this legislation and ensure that millions of the poorest children will be left to sink, to disappear from mainstream society and remain a part of the so-called ‘under-class’. From birth, it would appear that the American government has chosen not to protect its citizens and thus renege on its obligations as a civilised nation.

It is not just in terms of healthcare, the American system (particularly under Bush) has displayed a blatant disregard for the ordinary working man/woman. Many Americans were proud of their achievement of being the ‘Most Productive’ workers, according to a UN report. But this reputation has come at a heavy price. Once again, the political leadership had a choice: protect the citizen, or allow them to sink. Once again, Bush chose the latter. Despite their reputation, the American worker suffers intolerable working standards. Unionisation is practically obsolete, with only 12.5% of workers owning union membership in 2005. Under Bush’s watch, the minimum wage has dropped from $5.84 in 2000 to $5.15 in 2005, the median family income dropped by $1,000 between 200 and 2004 and the lowest quintile saw its annual income after tax decrease by $200, while the top 1% saw their incomes grow by $53,000. The workers have been left to sink by Bush, while the wealthy continue to swim at a healthy pace.

The Bush administration has also failed to protect the rights of the indigenous people of America. When given the opportunity to vote on a treaty that set out the rights of the indigenous people, including protection of their human rights and their land, the United States was one of only four countries to vote against the treaty. Once again, we see how the Bush administration fails to abide by its obligations to protect all its citizens. In fact, its treatment of indigenous people has also been condemned by Amnesty International. Amnesty has claimed that:

Native American and Alaska Native women in the United States suffer disproportionately high levels of rape and sexual violence, yet the federal government has created substantial barriers to accessing justice, Amnesty International (AI) asserted in a 113-page report released today. Justice Department figures indicate that American Indian and Alaska Native women are 2.5 times more likely to be raped or sexually assaulted than women in the United States in general; more than one in three Native women will be raped in their lifetimes.

Native Americans are, like many other sections of society, left to sink to the bottom. The Bush administration has washed their hands of them, much like the poor and the workers.

But it is not just internal affairs that the Bush administration has failed the American people and endangered them, foreign policy has put America at risk like never before. The sympathy spawned from the attacks on 11th September, has been squandered as the US government seeks it tighten its grip on the world. However, the tighter they squeeze, the more anti-Americanism will grow. This in turn will lead to greater difficulties on the world stage and America’s increased isolation from the civilised world. This isolation will make all Americans vulnerable and put them at great risk. If current trends in foreign policy were to continue, the entire nation will sink without a trace.

In short, the American administration has done its best to ensure that the poor and the dispossessed sink to the bottom, while the wealthy rise to the top. If America is ever going to regain its status as a respected, civilised nation, it needs to stop threatening sovereign nations of the world and start focusing on the needs of the poor in their own country. Martin Luther King once said:

“I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal."

Forty-four years later, it remains a dream.

Sunday, October 07, 2007

Blog to America

I have been asked by the people behind Blog to America to write a letter to America expressing my views on the country and how it is viewed across the globe. I hope to start drafting something in the near future, and I will post a copy of said letter here once completed. In the meantime, take the opportunity to check out Blog to America to find out more.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Compliments From Fellow Blogger

Saboma at Maryannaville has very kindly acknowledged by blog with the following badges:



Not sure if this is actually deserved, but many thanks to Saboma for her continued support.

Friday, September 07, 2007

Hezbollah Fighters Did Not Systematically Embed Themselves With Civilians in Lebanon

A little while back, certain commentators were jumping all over a report released by Human Rights Watch (HRW) regarding the war in Lebanon last summer. According to reports:

"Human Rights Watch's report said it found numerous rockets fired by Hezbollah in which there was no apparent legitimate military target, indicating civilians were deliberately attacked.

The report also said Hezbollah's justifications that the rocket attacks were a response to Israeli fire into southern Lebanon and aimed at drawing Israel into a ground war had no legal basis under the rules of war.


"Hezbollah's explanations for why it fired rockets at Israel's civilian population utterly fail to justify these unlawful attacks," said Sarah Leah Whitson, director of Human Rights Watch's Middle East and North Africa division. "Hezbollah, like Israel, must respect the laws of war."


This was given as evidence, by the usual suspects (ie USS Neverdock), that Hezbollah was the only guilty party in the conduct of the war. Amongst the many other accusations of bloggers such as these, were claims that the reporting of civilian casualties in Lebanon was grossly exaggerated. Marc at USS Neverdock has gone so far as to call these claims 'lies'. Now a new report by HRW has exposed these counter-claims as lies themselves. According to The Guardian:

Israel was accused yesterday of firing indiscriminately during last year's 34-day war in Lebanon in a report by Human Rights Watch which challenged Israel's claim that the high number of civilian casualties resulted from Hizbullah shielding itself among the Lebanese population.

In a 249-page investigation, the New York-based group said its research showed that even though the militants were also guilty of serious violations of the laws of war, there was no evidence that they systematically fought from among civilians.

Kenneth Roth, the executive director of Human Rights Watch, dismissed Israel's claim to have killed 600 Hizbullah fighters. He said the best estimate was that there were 250 Hizbullah fighters among the 1,109 Lebanese deaths. About 160 Israeli civilians and soldiers were killed.


So, the levels of civilian deaths would appear to be accurate after all. Not only that, it would appear that the oft-repeated claims of elements of the mainstream media (that embedding themselves within the civilian population was part of a systematic policy) was entirely fabricated in order to support Israeli bombing raids. This report was itself buried on page 8 of the international edition of The Guardian (I would be interested to know where it was placed in the domestic edition).

Of course, we shouldn't expect this report to make an appearance on right-wing blogs, unless they attempt to discredit it. This is the problem with many right-wing commentators when they use human rights organisations' reports to support their arguments. They spend too often discrediting them, it seems hard to believe that they would then take the report as gospel just because it 'supports' their tenuous arguments. There will, no doubt, be further attacks on HRW on blogs like USS Neverdock which rather undermines their arguments when they use them as evidence. Who decides when a report by a human rights organisation is worthy or not? You either support their findings in their entirety, or you do not. You cannot pick and choose which ones are valid based on political prejudice. Those that do, can never be taken seriously as a political commentator. But then I guess these bloggers have no intention of being treated as serious commentators, they are merely interested in spreading one-sided propaganda.

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

The Merits of Debate in The World of Blogs

I have been pretty critical of right-wingers in the past on this blog, justifiably so in some cases. However, kudos must go to Martin Simms, a guy who has been engaged in debate with me over the appropriate response to the situation in Iran. Suffice it to say, he tends towards the pre-emptive strike end of the spectrum. Although the debate was heated, sometimes perhaps too heated, it ended on good terms. Martin ended the debate with the following words:

Thank you for a wonderful debate, it was both educational and inspirational. Take care...Martin Sims Homepage 04.09.07 - 12:29 am #

A gracious an satisfactory way to end a debate. Martin was also kind enough to send me an email about the debate. He wrote:

Your points are shared by many, as are mine, but it is only through debate that reasonable people can come to understand where those with differing opinions are coming from. I do not think you are ignorant or evil because of your point of view, and I certainly hope that you do not think that I am ignorant or evil because of my point of view. I learned from our discussion as I trust you did, and it is just such an expansion of vision that I am most interested in fostering in myself and others...

Now, putting politics aside for one moment, this is what I truly respect. Many bloggers out there are not keen on opening up to a public debate. There are those out there who seek to shut down debate as it would expose their rather tenuous grip on the subject matter. Coincidentally, at around the same time as this debate, I discovered that I had been banned from commenting on another site, USS Neverdock. I have sent many comments to Marc at Neverdock in order to make a few points about the many things he posts on his site. Disappointingly, instead of engaging in debate, he simply refuses to publish anything that contradicts his viewpoint. That this amounts to a certain degree of totalitarianism (something he claims to oppose), seems entirely lost on him.

I would have far greater respect for bloggers such as Marc if they spent the time to explain their views. The fact that they broadly ignore anything that opposes their world view speaks volumes about how fearful they are that their arguments will be exposed and ridiculed in public. Instead of exposing themselves to scrutiny, they prefer to avoid the possibility altogether by indulging in censorship. What are they so afraid of? Are there views so under-developed that they cannot defend them against such scrutiny?? I sympathise to a degree, it can be very tempting to delete comments that you cannot argue against, but to do so suggests a level of intellectual bankruptcy. I try to employ a policy of allowing all comments on my site, unless they go over a very distinct line. I have deleted and banned one commenter who made anti-Semitic remarks about September 11th. I have also deleted defamatory remarks that claim that I am anti-Semitic. As far as I am concerned, along as the commenter doesn't indulge in racism or anti-Semitism, I will not delete their posts, no matter how deranged their point of view. For me that is the only way civilisation can develop. To debate and to argue different perspectives. Anything else is giving in to the ideals of totalitarianism.

Friday, August 03, 2007

USS Neverdock - Tenuous Link of the Week

UK - Scouts banned from eating burgers and bangers

by Muslims.


"Clare Haines, a spokesman for the Scout Association, said: "It was really to do with religion that we were not able to provide sausages and burgers and all that kind of food.

"We have been very careful to make sure food is provided to everybody's tastes and beliefs, so no one feels left out. "


No, Clare, it has to do with one religion, Islam, which is imposing its will on western civilization. And thanks to people like you they are succeeding.

As for "one feels left out," what about the non Muslims who wanted a hot dog Clare? What about them? They are being denied because of jihadist appeasers like you.
Labels: Islam



Link posted by Marc @ 11:48 AM Main Page Digg This! Comments Trackback


Mmmm yeah, must be those pesky Muslims. Can't be anything to do with Jews or Hindus, could it? I mean, it's not as if they have any special dietary requirements, do they?

Friday, July 27, 2007

Apologies and Welcome

Apologies for lack of posting, been rather busy the past few days. However, with a week-end off to look forward to, I hope to get some posts published that have been in the pipeline. One concerns the continued terrorist links with the Colombian government and the other concerns the hypocrisy of the right-wing.

I am also going to take this opportunity to welcome a new member of the team from Typing is Not Activism. An Australian blogger who will be giving an insight into what is really going on in Australia in the lead up to the elections. Hopefully a post will be heading here shortly. So, welcome to MOA and I hope you will get as much out of this as we will.

Friday, July 20, 2007

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

A New Voice on MOA

Starting tonight, there is a new contributor on MOA. Alongside myself and Rick B, I now welcome Gonzalo. I am very pleased to have a new voice on this blog in an attempt to broaden the scope of Mask of Anarchy. Gonzalo will be posting in his native Spanish as I am keen to get a variety of voices and to move away from the typical English-only blogs that seem to dominate the web. I am not aware of too many blogs that have contributors from both English speaking and non-English speaking backgrounds, so this will be interesting.

Anyway, welcome to Gonzalo and I look forward to reading his posts with interest.

Muchos gracias.

Saturday, June 09, 2007

What's Going On??

This blog is going through a bit of a refurb at the moment. The sidebar will be in a bit of state until I get everything in place. I guess I should have done this in one hit, but I couldn't be bothered. Any feedback would be welcome.

Monday, May 28, 2007

MOA - Trolling the Right-Wing Nutters So You Don't Have To

Ok, it has been a while since I posted on the lunatic ravings of the frothy mouthed right-wing bloggers, but they have amused me so much recently, I had to share it. A little while back I visited Biased BBC (tip: if you want to experience modern-day conspiracy theorists, have a look - they are barking), just to see how they were doing and engage in a little bit of banter. Before I knew it, I was caught up in a rather bizarre series of comments. It all started when I wrote the following:

korova: Whoop-dee-doo!!! I have written letters to the BBC and got them to change their reporting. As well as writing to a Tory MP and exposing his blatant racism. Sadly, as I have discovered, you don't get a medal for your efforts. Still, I'm sure your mummy is very proud of you.

korova
Homepage 07.05.07 - 6:43 pm #

The response was odd to say the least:

Biodegradable:
Still, I'm sure your mummy is very proud of you.

korova 07.05.07 - 6:43 pm

She would be if she were still alive, but she died more than 30 years ago. (May she rest in peace)

Now piss off you nasty little brat!

Biodegradable 07.05.07 - 6:52 pm
#

Weird eh? It didn't end their though:

Biodegradable: Oh dear, 'Have I already exhausted your debating skills?'

korova 07.05.07 - 6:56 pm

You got personal and insulted the memory of my mother.

What kind of sick cretin needs to drag my family into a debate?

You're filth.

Biodegradable 07.05.07 - 7:07 pm
#

And then:

Biodegradable: Yeah but Bio, only if she knew your mother personally would such an insult have teeth?

I disagree. Like I said, to bring anybody's family into a debate is beyond the pale. It's making things personal when the debate isn't about us.

korova is obviously young and immature because she assumes we all still have parents that are alive. I imagine she still lives with hers too.

Biodegradable 07.05.07 - 7:52 pm
#

What a weird set of comments. I'm not quite sure how saying 'your mummy will be proud' is quite so offensive, but there you go. Some of us are a little weaker than others. The latest batch of comments from Biased BBC is no disappointment. Take this comment from 'Wayne', who seems to think we are living in the seventeenth century:

Wayne:
It's interesting that the first picture in the series has the following caption:

Tony Blair became Prime Minister when the Labour Party won the 1997 General Election. For the previous 18 years, the UK had been ruled by the Conservatives.

And here was I thinking it was the Queen that ruled, not the Conservatives.

More shoddiness from Al-Beeb.

Wayne 27.05.07 - 7:22 pm
#

Yes, let that last sentence roll around your head for a bit. 'It was the Queen that ruled'. I must have slept through that. The Queen ruled the country in the 1980s??? Yes, it was the Queen that broke the miner's strike. I remember it well. I seem to remember her screaming 'Off with their heads' on BBC1. In fact, rumour has it that there is footage of the Queen riding her horse through the picket lines and smashing miner's skulls with a baton. She's got a mean streak that Queen y'know. And don't even get me started on when she tried to introduce the poll tax. What a bitch. The next comment that caught my eye was a typical case of right-wing obfuscation. Earlier on the thread I discussed the lie that the media is left-wing:

korova:

'Of the papers you make the classic schoolboy mistake of equating right wing with supporting all right of centre parties and supporting the war with supporting Bush.'

Really? So are you telling me that the Mudroch [sic] papers, plus the Express, Mail and Telegraph are anti-Bush?? You also make the schoolboy mistake of separating BBC1 and 2. You can hardly count them as two examples of anti-American news coverage. Unless you are desperate of course.

Even taking into account your skewed logic, once you add ITV and Sky (clearly pro-American/pro-bush) the figures now become:

Pro-republican: 6
Pro-Democrat (if you were to include the BBC and C4): 6
Neutral: 1 (ITV)

No sane person would claim that the UK is dominated by a left-wing media. It just doesn't hold up to scrutiny. But then, this is site is devoted to a vast conspiracy theory.

korova Homepage 28.05.07 - 12:28 pm #

No sane person, unless you live in conspiracy land. A rather bizarre response from one blogger:

IiD:
Korava[sic]

Tell me, behind your corporate built IKEA driven lifestyle of "New Left" clap trap that pollutes your advert...ooopps blog,when not engaging in neo liberal banter, since when does being "right wing" equate with "pro-war"?

All those poor child solders [sic] clutching the "peoples weapon" the AK-47 where [sic] all built by those very very very nice socialists in the USSR, or the widespread use of assassinations and torture by the 'victorious' VC, or when those ever so nice people POUM in the Spanish Civil War where quite happy to become war loving mobs burning down churches with the congregation in it....

Still keep jabbering away on Corporate Google (provided by Microsoft Windows) and dream on....'Anarchy' and 'socialism'-kills more people than Spanish Flu.

IiD 28.05.07 - 1:07 pm #


Er, come again?? I think someone has got their radical left-wing ideologies a little confused. The USSR? The VC? The POUM? Not sure how any of these relate to my views. Particularly the POUM, who were generally mis-trusted by the CNT (the representative of anarchists). In fact, the CNT, reluctantly supported the Communist move to expel the POUM from the Catalan government, despite the reservations of more radical elements within the CNT who trusted the Communists even less than the Trotskyist POUM. Still, I guess it all looks the same to those who do not understand such things. But again, this is typical of the right. They are quick to dismiss any suggestion that the right is broadly similar (as they have done in this case), but will paint anyone of the left as 'socialists' and 'communists', ignoring the many differences between the different factions. After all, no sane person would suggest socialism, communism and anarchism are the roughly the same.

Luckily, these guys are on the fringes of serious, rational debate. As long as they continue with sweeping generalisations like these, they will remain on the fringes for a very long time. Although maybe that will change when we are ruled by King Charles III.

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Some Sites to Check Out

The following have been added to my blogroll:

Confederación Nacional del Trabajo (CNT - Spanish anarchist labour confederation. Located under Information), Carnival of Anarchy, breathe, Further Left Forum, The Pseudo-Independent and Left in East Dakota.

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Best Political Blog???

Well, someone (my good friend Saboma to be precise) has nominated this blog as 'Best Political Blog', which is very flattering (and a little undeserved but hey, I'm not going to knock a compliment!!). Apparently you can cast your vote as to which site you believe is the 'Best Political Blog' by clicking on the link. I guess I will have to add the badge in my sidebar and you never know, maybe someone, somewhere might agree.

Thanks again Saboma.

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Exciting News Revealed

So, here's the news. In an earlier post I had written about my upcoming return to university and the lack of blogging that was likely to result. Consequently, I have been looking for people to make a contribution to ensure that the blog would continue during my period of occasional blogging. It is my pleasure to announce that RickB, from Ten Percent, has joined Mask of Anarchy and will be contributing posts from now on.

RickB has helped me a lot in the past few months, particularly with the development of the David Hicks YouTube video. He has also been doing a lot of work building links up with Iranian blogs in an effort to cut through the propaganda and get to the 'real' Iran (via Iran Blogapalooza). As such, I am really looking forward to this partnership and I am excited about the prospect of having a new contributor on board to share the load. RickB will be contributing his first post in the very near future, so keep reading!

If anyone else would like to contribute posts to Mask of Anarchy, please email me using the link in the sidebar. All applications will be carefully considered!!

Thanks and welcome RickB.

Friday, March 23, 2007

Thoggers of the World Unite

Obsolete has very kindly tagged me (as well as four other blogs) as a 'thinking blogger'. While I am very grateful for the compliment, it means I have to tag five other blogs. So, my Thoggers are:

1) Ten Percent
2) Theft is Good
3) Wilson's Blogmanac
4) MaryannavilleTM
5) Reality-Based Educator

Apologies to those I missed out, I only wish I could do ten.

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Contributors Wanted

Ok, let's lay this on the line. I'm going back to university next month to study for a Masters and I'm unlikely to blog as often as I would like, which is where the title comes in. If you have similar views to mine (doesn't have to be an exact match!), I would like to hear from you. I'm not sure how it will work at the moment, I can't decide whether to go for special guest posts or a full on membership to this site. One thing I am sure of is that I am not planning on abandoning this blog and washing my hands of the whole thing, I am determined to keep it up and running long term. So if you would like to write a guest post, or contribute on a longer term basis, please get in touch via the contact link in the sidebar. Thanks.

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Walter Reed Hospital

With thanks to Saboma who drew my attention to it, a soldier inside the Walter Reed Hospital is currently writing a blog. To find out more about the inside story at the hospital, click here.

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com