Showing posts with label Andrew Roberts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Andrew Roberts. Show all posts

Sunday, November 18, 2007

The Big Question - Andrew Roberts or Douglas Murray

Well, the results are in and the winner (garnering 73% of the vote) is Douglas Murray. So congratulations to Douglas 'Ladies and Gentlemen' Murray. You really are a massive c*nt.

So, I guess I should start a new poll. This time the big question centers on lovable ambassador for the blogging community, Iain Dale. Quite frankly, I find the man deeply irritating and I feel he is the perfect example of all that is wrong with the blogging fraternity (safe, banal nonsense - not to mention the fact that he is local to me and therefore partly responsible for the Tory hell-hole in which I dwell). So have your say on 'The Big Question'.

In fact, I hate him so much, I have composed this little ode to the man destined to hammer the last nail in the coffin of the blogging community. Obsessive?? Maybe. You decide.


I really hate that Iain Dale,
That Tory scumbag
Is a pygmy sperm whale.
He haunts my dreams
With Thatcherite screams.
I really hate that Iain Dale.


Monday, November 12, 2007

The Big Question - Andrew Roberts or Douglas Murray

Too close to call at the moment. Five votes so far for Murray and three for Roberts. It's a tough choice but it's all down to you. Maybe we could rustle up some kind of award for the winner. Best get my thinking cap on.

Friday, November 09, 2007

The Big Question

As a homage to Nicky Campbell's high quality debating show on Sunday morning (er.....), and in relation to my last post, I thought it was time to put the 'Big Question' to the public. Remember every vote counts (for jack shit, we live in a Western, capitalist democracy remember??).

Sunday, September 30, 2007

Andrew Roberts - A Despicable Stain On The Reputation of A Worthy Discipline

On the subject of mad as a box of frogs right-wingers, here's the latest delight from Andrew 'if only it was 1930s Germany' Roberts in today's special piece in The Observer on democracy:

Are dictators ever good?

Very, very rarely, but occasionally. They can be useful in civil wars or near-insurrection, such as in Spain in the Thirties and Chile in the Seventies, to prevent takeovers by Marxist-inspired movements that would deny democracy in the future, since both Generals Franco and Pinochet eventually handed over to a democratic system in a way that until the late 1980s Communists never did. Dictators almost always carry on in office well after the initial need for them has gone, however, and their record on human rights is generally terrible. Presently, President Musharraf of Pakistan is the personification of a 'good' dictator, protecting his country from Islamic fundamentalist terrorism, but he needs to spot the right moment to leave, and the right person to whom to hand over power.

Yes, good old Franco and Pinochet.....they were quite benevolent really, weren't they? As for Musharraf, nice to see Roberts adopting my preferred terminology for him (although the irony appears to be missing), I'm sure those that have been victim to the MQM might think differently though (not to mention his assault on Geo TV).

Not to be outdone, professional shit blogger (Guido Fawkes) adds his weight to the proceedings:

Are women more democratic?

Not in our house.

Andrew Roberts, Melanie Phillips and Guido Fawkes in one day?? Hand me the pills.

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com